GARY SNYDER: ‘WILD’
“The word wild is like a grey fox trotting off through the forest, ducking behind bushes, going in and out of site. Up close, first glance, it is ‘wild’ – then further into the woods next glance it’s ‘wyld’ and it recedes and it recedes via Old Norse villr and Old Tuetonic wilthijaz into a faint pre-Tuetonic ghweltijos which means, still, wild and maybe wooded (wald) and lurks back there with possible connections to will, to Latin silva (forest, sauvage) and to the Indo-European root ghwer, base of Latin ferus (feral, fierce), which swings us around to Thoreau’s ‘awful ferity’ shared by virtuous people and lovers. The Oxford English Dictionary has it this way:
Of animals – not tame, undomesticated, unruly
Of plants – not cultivated
Of land – uninhabited, uncultivated
Of foodcrops – produced or yielded without cultivation
Of societies – uncivilized, rude, resisting constituted government
Of individuals – unrestrained, insubordinate, licentious, dissolute, loose. “Wild and wanton widowes”, 1614
Of behavior – violent, destructive, cruel, unruly
Of behavior – artless, free, spontaneous. “Warble his native wood-notes wild” – John Milton
Wild is largely defined in our dictionaries by what – from a human standpoint – it is not. It cannot be seen by this approach for what is is. Turn it the other way:
Of animals – free agents, each with its own endowments, living in natural systems
Of plants – self-propagating, self-maintaining, flourishing in accord with innate qualities
Of land – a place where the original and potential vegetation and fauna are intact and in full interaction and the landforms are entirely the result of non-human forces. Pristine.
Of foodcrops – food supplies made available and sustainable by the natural excess and exuberance of wild plants in their growth and in the production of quantities of fruit and seeds
Of societies – societies whose order has grown from within and is maintained by the force of consensus and custom rather than explicit legislation. Primary cultures, which consider themselves the original and eternal inhabitants of their territory. Societies which resist political and economic domination by civilization. Societies whose economic system is in a close and sustainable relation to the local ecosystem
Of individuals – following local custom, style and etiquette without concern for the standards of the metropolis or nearest trading post. Unintimidated, self-reliant, independent
Of behavior – freely resisting any oppression, confinement or exploitation. Far-out, outrageous, ‘bad’, admirable.
Of behavior – artless, free, spontaneous, unconditioned. Expressive, physical, openly sexual, ecstatic
Most of the senses in this second set of definitions come close to being how the Chinese define the term Dao, the way of Great Nature: eluding analysis, beyond categories, self-organizing, self-informing, playful, surprising, impermanent, insubstantial, independent, complete, orderly, unmediated, freely manifesting, self-authenticating, self-willed, complex, quite simple. Both empty and real at the same time. In some cases, we might call it sacred. It is not far from the Buddhist term Dharma with its original senses of forming and firming.”
Gary Snyder The Practice of the Wild Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint, 1990
In a preface to the 2010 edition, Gary Snyder describes his path as “a kind of old time Buddhism which remains connected to animist and shamanist roots. Respect for all living beings is a basic part of that tradition. I have tried to teach others to meditate and enter into the wild areas of the mind. … Even language can be seen as a wild system”.
I like Gary Snyder’s reference to “a kind of old time Buddhism”. I feel Buddhism to often be too polite and intellectual. I would like to see an element of the wild and ecstatic more present, yet maintaining its ethical concerns.
Agreed. It would make quite a difference!
I rather like Gary Snyder’s Smokey the Bear Sutra.. http://www.sacred-texts.com/bud/bear.htm
Just read it. Loved it. Thanks for passing it on.